Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica
ID: NCT07632612
Our intelligence engine has synthesized this trial record to answer your most important questions in clear, simple terms:
objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.
Read Full Scientific Objectives & Methods
Due to the increasing prevalence of sciatica and evidence based treatment options using physiotherapy that offers effective alleviation of pain and rehabilitation of function. Neurodynamic mobilization focuses on addressing neurological problems; thus, there is a need to know about the effectiveness of the different types of the technique being used. The current research is expected to contribute to the existing literature in the area of physiotherapy concerning the identification of the most effective neurodynamic technique in the case of sciatica. These findings could be helpful for medical practitioners during their work, making decisions and planning treatment. At the same time, the results of the investigation may become the basis for further research.
will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
Treatment Arms Description
Participants will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
Participants will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
- Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks
- Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg
- Positive Slump Test
- Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°
- Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting
- BMI \< 20 kg/m² or \> 30 kg/m²
- Previous history of spinal surgery
- Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)
- Peripheral neuropathy
- History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma
- Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)
- Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)
- Pregnancy
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pain intensity — Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
will be measured using VAS
- Functional disability — Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
View Secondary Outcome Measures (2)
- Hip range of motion — Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
assessed using Goniometer
- Lumbar flexion Range of Motion — Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)
This trial is recruiting at 1 study facilities worldwide. Click below to see if there is a clinic or hospital in your area:
Show All 1 Facilities & Contact Sites
Want to apply or inquire about joining this study? Fill out this simple questionnaire, and our assistant will instantly generate a professional email draft you can copy and send to the central contact coordinator listed above!
View Official Medical/Scientific Title
Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial